Search results (Index filtered)
Search for "
CREOLOPHUS":
3 articles found in Index.
KUNCA V., ČILIAK M., LUPTÁK R. (2018): Fruitbody production of Hericium erinaceus and its distribution in Slovakia [fructification, phenology, Quercus petraea, wood decay stage] Czech Mycology 70(2): 211-224 (published: 14th December, 2018)
abstract
The relationships between selected log parameters and occurrence of Hericium erinaceus fruitbodies as well as its phenological aspects and distribution in Slovakia were studied for the first time. The research was conducted with two datasets. The first dataset is based on 15-year monitoring of 20 oak logs with the aim to relate H. erinaceus preference to selected log variables. The other one comprises records obtained from 63 different localities in Slovakia. The monitoring data confirmed continual fruitbody production on the same dead log and at the same position for three consecutive years. Furthermore, the fruitbodies were observed for five continual years in the same section of a living oak tree trunk. Of the studied log characteristics, H. erinaceus showed preference for smaller log sizes. Based on the second dataset, the main fructification period is dated from August to November, but fruitbodies can be found until February. Logs with fruitbodies were predominantly classified into the initial wood decay stage (Stage 2). The majority (92%) of the localities were situated in areas with a mean annual temperature above 6 °C.
HOLEC J., KŘÍŽ M., POUZAR Z., ŠANDOVÁ M. (2015): Boubínský prales virgin forest, a Central European refugium of boreal-montane and old-growth forest fungi. [Mt. Boubín, Bohemian Forest, Czech Republic, Basidiomycota, Ascomycota, diversity, ecology, distribution] Czech Mycology 67(2): 157-226 (published: 10th September, 2015)
abstract
Boubínský prales virgin forest is the best-preserved montane Picea-Fagus-Abies forest in the Czech Republic. Its core area (46.67 ha), grown with original montane forest never cut nor managed by foresters, has been protected since 1858. It represents the centre of the present-day nature reserve (685.87 ha). A detailed inventory of its fungal diversity was carried out in 2013–2014. Ten segments differing in habitat and naturalness were studied (235 ha). The total number of species was 659, with the centre of diversity in the core area (503 species) followed by the neighbouring segments grown by natural forests minimally influenced by man. When literature and herbarium data are added, the total diversity reaches a total of 792 taxa. The locality represents a unique refugium for some borealmontane fungi (e.g. Amylocystis lapponica, Laurilia sulcata, Pholiota subochracea), a high number of rare species preferring old-growth forests (Antrodia crassa, A. sitchensis, Baeospora myriadophylla, Chrysomphalina chrysophylla, Fomitopsis rosea, Ionomidotis irregularis, Junghuhnia collabens, Skeletocutis odora, S. stellae, Tatraea dumbirensis), wood-inhabiting and mycorrhizal fungi confined to Abies (Panellus violaceofulvus, Phellinus pouzarii, Pseudoplectania melaena, Lactarius albocarneus), and a high number of indicators of well-preserved Fagus forests (e.g.Climacodon septentrionalis, Flammulaster limulatus, Pholiota squarrosoides). Several very rare fungi are present, e.g. Chromosera cyanophylla, Cystoderma subvinaceum and Pseudorhizina sphaerospora. The value of the local mycobiota is further emphasised by the high number of protected and Red List species. Comparison with other Central European old-growth forests has confirmed that Boubínský prales is a mycological hotspot of European importance.
PILÁT A. (1968): Diversity and phylogenetic position of the Thelephoraceae sensu amplissimo. Česká Mykologie 22(4): 247-258 (published: 1968)
abstract
The family of fungi Thelephoraceae in the system of Fries and other older authors is seemingly well-organized, and if it were not for the large number of species, it would be easy to navigate, as earlier mycologists believed. In the early 20th century, however, it became clear that this is a highly heterogeneous group, and that neither the content of the family nor the delimitations of the genera are sustainable, since they combine unrelated elements on the basis of superficial morphological similarities that are evolutionarily insignificant. The study of Thelephoraceae sensu amplissimo and its phylogeny-based classification was advanced by many mycologists including P.A. Karsten, V. Fayod, N. Patouillard, V. Litschauer, E.M. Wakefield, E.A. Burt, S. Lundell, H. Bourdot, G.H. Cunningham, M.A. Donk, P.D. Rogers, H.S. Jackson, R. Singer, J. Boidin, G.W. Martin, L.S. Olive, P.H. Talbot, P.L. Lentz, J. Eriksson, M. Svrček, D.A. Reid, E. Parmasto, A.E. Liberta, among others. There is no doubt that the group includes the origins of nearly all eubasidiomycetes and also various branches of Auriculariales and Tremellales. This complicates classification to such a degree that no two systematic works use the same system, and this state of taxonomic chaos is expected to persist.
Back to "
CREOLOPHUS" (Index view)
-----------------
job done in 0.0406 sec.
